In recent daysmediaobiegła głośna sprawa Karola Nawrockiego i przejęcia mieszkania po panu Jerzym Ż. Czy kandydat na prezydenta faktycznie dopuścił się oszustwa? Oto najważniejsze fakty i kulisy tej kontrowersyjnej historii.
How did Karol Nawrocki take Mr. Jerzy Ż's apartment?
Sprawa zaczęła się w 2008 roku, gdy Karol Nawrocki zaczął pomagać starszemu, samotnemu panu Jerzemu Żwickiemu. Cztery lata później Nawrocki pożyczył mumoneyna wykup komunalnej kawalerki w Gdańsku z dużą bonifikatą. W 2012 roku podpisano przedwstępną umowę sprzedaży, a w 2017 roku mieszkanie oficjalnie przeszło na własność Nawrockiego i jego żony.
Care agreement
According to the findings of journalists, the transfer of the apartment was to be in exchange for the care of Mr Jerzy Ż, which is confirmed by a hand-written statement found by the social worker. However, after the transaction was finalized, the senior went to the State Social Services House and the city services took care of him. The city of Gdańsk pays for his stay and Nawrocki does not contribute to the maintenance of the former neighbour.
Babysitter's voice and social reactions
Anna Kanigowska, the guardian of Mr Jerzy Ż, claims that she visited a senior every year and never met Nawrocki or his family. She was the one who paid the electricity bills and was the real support for Mr. George. In her opinion, the whole situation is a "normal fraud" – the senior transferred the apartment in exchange for care he never received.
The mechanism of taking over apartments – is it legal?
Mr. George's case is not isolated. In practice, the wealthier people often "help" seniors buy out a municipal apartment and then take over after a few years, bypassing the rules on the repayment of the bonus. Although formally everything happens according to the law, serious moral doubts arise – especially when the promise of care is not fulfilled.
What would Charles Nawrocki say?
Nawrocki claims that he helped Mr. Jeriego and borne the cost of living the apartment, but does not provide evidence. According to the sitter and reporters, he did not maintain contact with the senior after taking over the premises. The case caused a storm in the media and divided public opinion.
Is Charles Nawrocki a fraud?
- Mr. George's apartment went to Nawrocki in exchange for declared care.
- Senior did not receive the promised help and went to DPS.
- The social worker confirms that Nawrocki failed to fulfill his moral contract.
- The mechanism of taking over apartments is legal, but raises ethical controversy.
The case of Karol Nawrocki shows how easily gaps in the law and trust of the elderly can be exploited. Is that cheating? We leave the answer to the readers.
