In Polish politics, where ideological disputes often turn into personal attacks, another scandal has recently erupted and drawn the attention of social media. This time the centre of events is Łukasz Litewka, a Left MP, and Klaudia Domagała, a Confederation MP, who is backed by Marcin Możdżonek, President of the National Hunting Council (NRŁ) and a former volleyball player. The conflict, which initially concerned political questions about animal protection and the economy, quickly escalated into personal accusations, hate and the public airing of dirty laundry. Below we describe the whole affair step by step, based on available social media posts, comments and the context of earlier disputes.
Background to the conflict: ideological differences and earlier clashes
Łukasz Litewka, a Left MP, is known as an animal rights activist. He runs the Team Litewka Foundation, which helps animals and people in need. His political activity often focuses on ethical issues, such as a ban on fur farming or restrictions on hunting. Litewka builds his image on empathy and “building, not destroying,” as he often emphasises.
On the other side, Klaudia Domagała, a Confederation (New Hope) MP, represents conservative views, focusing on family issues, perinatal care and economic freedom. She initiated the Parliamentary Team for Perinatal Care and founded the Women for Freedom and Independence Foundation. As the mother of four children, she often stresses the role of women in society, but in the context of traditional values.
Marcin Możdżonek, former captain of the Polish national volleyball team, is president of the NRŁ. As a hunter, Możdżonek supports hunting, which has previously placed him in opposition to animal rights activists, such as Litewka. Możdżonek is associated with the Confederation milieu, as seen in posts and discussions where he supports the party’s MPs.
The conflict did not come out of nothing. Earlier clashes date back to October 2025 at the latest. Łukasz Litewka publicly criticised the Ford Polska brand at that time for giving a car to Możdżonek, arguing that the company was supporting a hunter. In a post on X (formerly Twitter), Litewka accused Możdżonek of promoting hunting, which triggered a wave of comments. Możdżonek responded by calling Litewka a “primitive manipulator and hater.” The episode revealed deep divisions: Litewka as the defender of animals versus Możdżonek as a representative of the hunting community.
In August 2025, Możdżonek publicly accused Litewka of using charity collections for political purposes, claiming that the Left MP “is riding on collections for little animals.”
The affair erupts: a post about furs and Litewka’s personal attack
The whole drama reached its peak at the end of November 2025. On 30 November, Klaudia Domagała published a post on X about the proposed ban on fur production in Poland. She argued that such a ban would simply move breeding to other countries, such as Russia, Ukraine, China, Denmark, the Netherlands or the USA, where conditions for animals may be worse. She stressed that these were economic facts, not ideology.
Łukasz Litewka’s response came quickly, but not on X; it appeared on Facebook (the post was later shared and discussed online). In a long post, Litewka accused Domagała of writing “nonsense,” lacking sober thinking, lying and not understanding reality. He misspelt her surname (probably deliberately), called her a “kid” (even though he is only one year older than her and she is a mother of four) and suggested that her most important trait is “attacking others.” Finally, he advised her to focus on “taking selfies” rather than politics. He illustrated the whole post with a photo of Domagała in a park, wearing a dress with a “panther” pattern, which was meant as an ironic comment on her appearance and activity.
The post triggered a flood of hate. Hundreds of comments insulting Domagała appeared under Litewka’s post. Users wrote: “Face longing for reason 😂”, “Seductive creature.”, “Dog f*cked me”, “Maybe we could turn her into a fur 😂”, “What a dim broad 😂”, “Dim spear”, “And put her in a cage and pull out her hair every so often…”, “Disgusting vile creature and nothing more, she is neither a human nor a woman 😢😢😢”. Others called her a “empty primitive broad with a raisin-sized brain” or an “empty brazen broad without reason.” “I am simply ashamed of that thing called Klaudia Domogala.”
A screenshot of this post and its comments quickly spread online, becoming a symbol of toxic hate. Litewka did not delete the post, which only made the situation worse.
Domagała’s and Możdżonek’s reaction: accusations of patriarchy and hate
On 1 December 2025, Klaudia Domagała responded on X. In a detailed post, she described Litewka’s attack as “ad personam” rhetoric, manipulation and sexist remarks. She stressed that there was little substance to it, with only a single sentence about the marginal impact of fur farming on GDP. She accused Litewka of promoting patriarchy, comparing him to the “Patriarchy Foundation.” She pointed to hypocrisy: a Left MP who declares respect for people encourages hate against women. “Women, know your role! ❤️ And beware of left-wing politicians, because until now they were known mainly for beating women (including their own mothers and partners), and now they will also, unfortunately, be insulting them,” she wrote. She called on Litewka to read the comments under his post and to engage in a substantive discussion.
Marcin Możdżonek quickly backed Domagała. In reply to her post he wrote briefly: “#teamhejtewka 🤷♂️”, playing on the words “Litewka” and “hejtewka” (from “hejt,” meaning hate). It symbolised the accusations of promoting hatred. Możdżonek’s support stems from their shared political circles and earlier conflicts with Litewka.
A wave of comments and the wider context
Domagała’s post drew dozens of replies. Some internet users supported her, criticising Litewka for lacking substance and for sexism. For example: “Don’t expect a leftist to use his brain 😉” or “The facts are relentless: one must remember that a ban on fur production in Poland moves business and jobs to places where conditions for animals are worse.” Others defended Litewka: “Dear colleague. Don’t you see that you’re peddling Confederation populism?”
The dispute quickly became a topic of wider discussion. Critics of the Left accused the party of hypocrisy on gender equality, while Confederation supporters saw an attack on economic freedom. Some internet users suggested that the attack was driven by the interests of the fur lobby or anti-hunting groups.
Consequences and conclusions
Will the conflict end in court (for example, a defamation lawsuit) or only on social media? For now, it remains open. One thing is certain: this drama shows how quickly political disputes can turn into personal vendettas, harming the image of all sides. In the background remains the key question: will a fur ban really help animals, or will it simply move the problem elsewhere? A substantive answer is still lacking.
