In the Polish world of politics, where ideological disputes often turn into personal attacks, another scandal recently broke out that caught the attention of social media. This time at the centre of the events were MP Łukasz Litewka and Member of the Confederacy Claudia Domagał, supported by Marcin Możjonek – President of the National Council of Hunting (NRŁ) and former volleyball player. The conflict, which initially dealt with political issues related to animal protection and the economy, quickly escalated to the level of personal accusations, hate and public dirty laundry. Below we describe the whole matter step by step, based on available posts on social media, comments and the context of previous disputes.
Conflict Background: Ideological Differences and Earlier Struggles
Łukasz Litewka, an MP of the Left, is known as a pro-animal activist. He runs Team Litewka Foundationwho helps animals and people in need. His political activities often focuses on ethical issues, such as bans on breeding animals on fur or limiting hunting. Litevka builds his image on empathy and "building rather than destruction", as he often emphasizes.
On the other hand, Claudia Domagada, a Confederate Member (New Hope), represents conservative views, focusing on family issues, perinatal care and economic freedom. She is the initiator of the parliamentary group on perinatal care and the founder of the Women of Freedom and Independence Foundation. As a mother of four children, she often emphasizes the role of women in society, but in the context of traditional values.
Marcin Możdzynek, former captain of the Polish volleyball team, is the president of NRŁ. As a hunter, Możdzyk is a hunter of hunting, which had previously put him in opposition to pro-animal activistsLike Litevka. The candidate is associated with the Confederate community, as was seen in the posts and discussions where he supports the MPs of this party.
The conflict didn't break out of anything. Earlier clashes date at least to October 2025. Łukasz Litewka publicly criticized Ford Polska for handing the car over to Możdźonko, arguing that the company supports the hunter. In a post on X (formerly Twitter), Lithuanians accused Możdjonek of promoting hunting, which sparked a wave of comments. The mogul responded, calling Lithuania a "primitive manipulator and hater". This event showed deep divisions: Litevka as an animal defender versus Możdźnik as a representative of the hunting community.
August 2025 Możdzyk publicly accused Litewka of using charitable collections for political purposes, claiming that an MP of the Left "will go to animal gatherings".
Big Bang: Post on fur and personal attack of Lithuania
The entire drama reached its climax in late November 2025. On 30 November, Claudia Domagagała published on the X post concerning the proposed ban on fur production in Poland. She argued that such a ban would only move farms to other countries such as Russia, Ukraine, China, Denmark, Holland or the USA, where animal conditions could be worse. She stressed that these were economic facts, not ideology.
Luke Litewka's reply came quickly, but not on X, but on Facebook (post later made available and discussed online). In a long post, Litewka accused Domagała of writing "foolhood", lack of sound thinking, lies, and deficiencies in understanding reality. He twisted her name (probably intentionally), called her a "child" (although she is only a year younger than him and is the mother of four children) and suggested that her most important attribute is "attacking others". Finally, he advised her to "do selfie" rather than politics. He illustrated the whole picture They demanded from the park, in a dress like a "panther", which was supposed to be an ironic commentary on its appearance and activity.
That post triggered a hateslide. Hundreds of insulting comments appeared under Lithuanian entry She did. Users wrote: "A man longing for reason 😂", "Fresh creature." "Do you know how much I've done?"*He was scared, "Maybe make her a fur coat 😂", "What a pace woman 😂"and put her in a cage like that, and what time to throw her hair away...", "an awful mean creature and nothing else, it's not man or woman 😢😢😢". Others called it "a hollow primitive woman with the brain of a raisin" or "a hollow brazen woman without reason." "I am simply ashamed of what is called Claudia Domogala."
Screenshot of this post and comments quickly ran around the network, becoming a symbol of toxic hate. Litevka did not remove the entry, which only made the situation worse.
The Reaction Required and Mozhionka: Accusations of Patriarchate and Hat
On December 1, 2025, Claudia Domagała responded to X. In a detailed entry, she described Lithuanian attack as a string of "ad personam", manipulation and sexist remarks. She stressed that there was little – only one sentence about the marginal impact of fur farming on GDP. She accused Lithuania of promoting the patriarchate, comparing it to the "Patriarchate Foundation". She pointed out hypocrisy: MP Lewica, who declares respect for people, encourages hate against women. "Women, know your part! ❤️ And watch out for left-wing politicians, for so far these have been known mainly for beating women (including their mothers and partners), now they will be, unfortunately, for insulting them," she wrote. She called on Lithuania to read comments on her post and substantive discussion.
Marcin Możdźnik quickly supported Domagała. In response to her post, he briefly wrote: "#teamheittevka 🤷♂️", playing with the words "Litewka" and "Heit" (from "Heit"). Symbolizing accusations of promoting hate. Możdjonk's support stems from their common political circles and previous conflicts with Lithuania.
Wave of comments and broader context
Domagała's Post collected several dozen answers – some netizens supported her, criticising Lithuania for lack of substance and sexism. For example: "Don’t keep your eyes off the left, that he’s using his brain 😉"whether "Facts are inexorable: one must remember that the ban on fur production in Poland moves business and workplaces where animal conditions are worse". Others defended Lithuanians: "My friend. Don't you see that you're slapping around with Confiant populism?"
The matter quickly became a topic of discussion in a broader context. Critics of the Left accused the party of hypocrisy on gender equality issues, and Confederate supporters saw in this attack on economic freedom. Some netizens suggested that behind the attack were the interests of the furry or anti-fishing lobby.
Consequences and conclusions
Will the conflict end in court (e.g. defamation suit) or only in social media? It remains open for now. One thing is certain: this drama shows how quickly political disputes can turn into a personal vendetta, damaging the image of all sides. In the background, the key question remains: will the ban on fur really help animals, or will it just move the problem elsewhere? There is still no substantive answer.
